<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for Indefinite Articles</title>
	<atom:link href="http://undefined.com/ia/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://undefined.com/ia</link>
	<description>Agile &#38; Open Source Software, Economics, Liberty and Entrepreneurship</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 11 Aug 2011 19:26:39 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.3</generator>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on About by droopie</title>
		<link>http://undefined.com/ia/about/comment-page-1/#comment-815927</link>
		<dc:creator>droopie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Aug 2011 19:26:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-815927</guid>
		<description>i was wondering if you cold let us know what is the code you used to save sounds on the soundboard. i am brand new to this and have tweaked the soundboard as far as i know how but am still new to this and cant figure out how to make the sounds downloadable. dont know how to construct the code within the already made soundboard.java</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i was wondering if you cold let us know what is the code you used to save sounds on the soundboard. i am brand new to this and have tweaked the soundboard as far as i know how but am still new to this and cant figure out how to make the sounds downloadable. dont know how to construct the code within the already made soundboard.java</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on The Fourteen Types of Programmers &#8211; Type 4: Lazy Ones by snapfla</title>
		<link>http://undefined.com/ia/2006/10/24/the-fourteen-types-of-programmers-type-4-lazy-ones/comment-page-1/#comment-799758</link>
		<dc:creator>snapfla</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Jan 2011 17:28:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://undefined.com/ia/2006/10/24/the-fourteen-types-of-programmers-type-4-lazy-ones/#comment-799758</guid>
		<description>I know this is a hella old post, but it still very much applies.  You&#039;ve seen inside my soul! :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I know this is a hella old post, but it still very much applies.  You&#8217;ve seen inside my soul! <img src='http://undefined.com/ia/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on random Jim Croce-inspired madness by Walter R. Moore</title>
		<link>http://undefined.com/ia/2011/01/04/random-jim-croce-inspired-madness/comment-page-1/#comment-797440</link>
		<dc:creator>Walter R. Moore</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Jan 2011 15:45:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://undefined.com/ia/2011/01/04/random-jim-croce-inspired-madness/#comment-797440</guid>
		<description>Awesome.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Awesome.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on one of the most useful commands ever for j2ee development by jb</title>
		<link>http://undefined.com/ia/2011/01/03/one-of-the-most-useful-commands-ever-for-j2ee-development/comment-page-1/#comment-795899</link>
		<dc:creator>jb</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Jan 2011 12:50:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://undefined.com/ia/?p=530#comment-795899</guid>
		<description>good to know, I&#039;ll take a look.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>good to know, I&#8217;ll take a look.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on one of the most useful commands ever for j2ee development by David</title>
		<link>http://undefined.com/ia/2011/01/03/one-of-the-most-useful-commands-ever-for-j2ee-development/comment-page-1/#comment-795883</link>
		<dc:creator>David</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Jan 2011 08:36:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://undefined.com/ia/?p=530#comment-795883</guid>
		<description>A fancier way is to use &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.jboss.org/tattletale&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;JBoss Tattletale&lt;/a&gt;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A fancier way is to use <a href="http://www.jboss.org/tattletale" rel="nofollow">JBoss Tattletale</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Farewell, Bloglines by Walter Moore</title>
		<link>http://undefined.com/ia/2010/09/13/farewell-bloglines/comment-page-1/#comment-783202</link>
		<dc:creator>Walter Moore</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Sep 2010 16:11:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://undefined.com/ia/?p=512#comment-783202</guid>
		<description>Yes.. I&#039;ve been on bloglines forever too. So, now they&#039;re gone and Google takes over one more bit of my on-line life in the form of Google Reader.

I see Google Apps as an example of someone (well, Google) doing exactly what you suggest for bloglines. Ironically, one of the Google products not included in Apps.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes.. I&#8217;ve been on bloglines forever too. So, now they&#8217;re gone and Google takes over one more bit of my on-line life in the form of Google Reader.</p>
<p>I see Google Apps as an example of someone (well, Google) doing exactly what you suggest for bloglines. Ironically, one of the Google products not included in Apps.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Issues &amp; Concerns w/Google Web Toolkit 2.0 by Kyle Baley</title>
		<link>http://undefined.com/ia/2010/08/27/issues-concerns-wgoogle-web-toolkit-2-0/comment-page-1/#comment-780530</link>
		<dc:creator>Kyle Baley</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Sep 2010 11:40:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://undefined.com/ia/?p=503#comment-780530</guid>
		<description>We just started a GWT project and I am (or was) exclusively a .NET developer. While there was a serious learning curve, my experience has been largely positive. The SEO problem isn&#039;t unique to GWT, any application with a lot of JavaScript will require some work. There is some work being done in this area but the framework we&#039;re using (gwt-platform) has helped. 

The compilation time bugged me at first too until someone said I was compiling too often. Once I realized that, I rarely have to do a full GWT compile anymore. Most often, it&#039;s done on our build server now.

We don&#039;t use any widgets so the testing story is quite different than what you describe here. Also, we&#039;re using Cucumber and Capybara to define features. Makes it easier to test up front stuff without having to use GWTTestCase. Will admit our coverage numbers aren&#039;t where they should be but that&#039;s my fault, not the framework&#039;s.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We just started a GWT project and I am (or was) exclusively a .NET developer. While there was a serious learning curve, my experience has been largely positive. The SEO problem isn&#8217;t unique to GWT, any application with a lot of JavaScript will require some work. There is some work being done in this area but the framework we&#8217;re using (gwt-platform) has helped. </p>
<p>The compilation time bugged me at first too until someone said I was compiling too often. Once I realized that, I rarely have to do a full GWT compile anymore. Most often, it&#8217;s done on our build server now.</p>
<p>We don&#8217;t use any widgets so the testing story is quite different than what you describe here. Also, we&#8217;re using Cucumber and Capybara to define features. Makes it easier to test up front stuff without having to use GWTTestCase. Will admit our coverage numbers aren&#8217;t where they should be but that&#8217;s my fault, not the framework&#8217;s.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Issues &amp; Concerns w/Google Web Toolkit 2.0 by Walter Moore</title>
		<link>http://undefined.com/ia/2010/08/27/issues-concerns-wgoogle-web-toolkit-2-0/comment-page-1/#comment-779881</link>
		<dc:creator>Walter Moore</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 28 Aug 2010 20:47:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://undefined.com/ia/?p=503#comment-779881</guid>
		<description>It has been really fascinating working closely with Google - in theory we are premium clients, because we&#039;re a college and a paying customer.

Like many other quickly growing tech companies in the past (Apple, for example), they seem to be operating in a bubble - even tech support and customer reps have a very poor idea how their actions affect customers or whether their tools are properly matched to real-world projects (other than Google&#039;s in-house work, for which of course they are probably perfect).

To me that&#039;s the first foreshadowing of serious trouble for Google in the future.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It has been really fascinating working closely with Google &#8211; in theory we are premium clients, because we&#8217;re a college and a paying customer.</p>
<p>Like many other quickly growing tech companies in the past (Apple, for example), they seem to be operating in a bubble &#8211; even tech support and customer reps have a very poor idea how their actions affect customers or whether their tools are properly matched to real-world projects (other than Google&#8217;s in-house work, for which of course they are probably perfect).</p>
<p>To me that&#8217;s the first foreshadowing of serious trouble for Google in the future.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Issues &amp; Concerns w/Google Web Toolkit 2.0 by Philippe Beaudoin</title>
		<link>http://undefined.com/ia/2010/08/27/issues-concerns-wgoogle-web-toolkit-2-0/comment-page-1/#comment-779566</link>
		<dc:creator>Philippe Beaudoin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Aug 2010 18:34:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://undefined.com/ia/?p=503#comment-779566</guid>
		<description>I have been developing well-tested production app in GWT for some time and I disagree with you (no sneering, just disagreement). Let me answer your various points here:

1. This is true of any ajax-heavy app. Today if you want well-indexed webpages, you either need to serve a lot of static HTML or adhere to this standard:
  http://code.google.com/web/ajaxcrawling/ 
Some frameworks (such as &lt;a href=&quot;http://gwtplatform.com&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;gwtplatform&lt;/a&gt;) makes it easy to support ajax crawling within your GWT app.

2. Google recommends using the Model-View-Presenter architecture to facilitate unit testing. Once you switch to that, you almost never have to use GWTUnitTest. Again, I recommend looking into &lt;a href=&quot;http://gwtplatform.com&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;gwtplatform&lt;/a&gt; for an MVP framework that saves you much of the boilerplate.

3. In your code coverage metric, do you take into account your javascript code? Because I find it much harder to get good unit testing in JS than in GWT, especially with an MVP architecture.

4. GWT&#039;s UiBinder let&#039;s you design most of your page following good old HTML constructs and CSS. On the other hand, the newer layout panels are a very simple way to design good cross-browser layouts for full-screen apps. I believe HorizontalPanel is no longer recommended, personally I never use it.

5. We run the GWT compilation on our continuous integration server. For daily development we run the app right into eclipse which doesn&#039;t require a compilation and allows for very efficient debugging.

Bottom line, my life has gotten much better since I started using GWT.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have been developing well-tested production app in GWT for some time and I disagree with you (no sneering, just disagreement). Let me answer your various points here:</p>
<p>1. This is true of any ajax-heavy app. Today if you want well-indexed webpages, you either need to serve a lot of static HTML or adhere to this standard:<br />
  <a href="http://code.google.com/web/ajaxcrawling/" rel="nofollow">http://code.google.com/web/ajaxcrawling/</a><br />
Some frameworks (such as <a href="http://gwtplatform.com" rel="nofollow">gwtplatform</a>) makes it easy to support ajax crawling within your GWT app.</p>
<p>2. Google recommends using the Model-View-Presenter architecture to facilitate unit testing. Once you switch to that, you almost never have to use GWTUnitTest. Again, I recommend looking into <a href="http://gwtplatform.com" rel="nofollow">gwtplatform</a> for an MVP framework that saves you much of the boilerplate.</p>
<p>3. In your code coverage metric, do you take into account your javascript code? Because I find it much harder to get good unit testing in JS than in GWT, especially with an MVP architecture.</p>
<p>4. GWT&#8217;s UiBinder let&#8217;s you design most of your page following good old HTML constructs and CSS. On the other hand, the newer layout panels are a very simple way to design good cross-browser layouts for full-screen apps. I believe HorizontalPanel is no longer recommended, personally I never use it.</p>
<p>5. We run the GWT compilation on our continuous integration server. For daily development we run the app right into eclipse which doesn&#8217;t require a compilation and allows for very efficient debugging.</p>
<p>Bottom line, my life has gotten much better since I started using GWT.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on What is Hadoop by Walter Moore</title>
		<link>http://undefined.com/ia/2010/07/21/what-is-hadoop/comment-page-1/#comment-773986</link>
		<dc:creator>Walter Moore</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Jul 2010 00:49:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://undefined.com/ia/?p=490#comment-773986</guid>
		<description>Good stuff this.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good stuff this.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Global Warming, Global Government by Joe</title>
		<link>http://undefined.com/ia/2008/03/05/global-warming-global-government/comment-page-1/#comment-773492</link>
		<dc:creator>Joe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 10 Jul 2010 17:32:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://undefined.com/ia/2008/03/05/global-warming-global-government/#comment-773492</guid>
		<description>Assuming the following: 
-global temperature is not affected by the sun&#039;s fluctuations;
-global temperature is directly affected by human carbon emissions;
-human carbon emissions are greater than such natural emmissions like volcano erruptions and ocean emmission and absortion of CO2;
-such human carbon emmissions are bad;
-government can control something as complicated as the weather by forcing humans to act or not act in certain ways;
-the bigger the government gets, the more efficient it becomes, and the less corrupt it becomes;

then, yes, only global government could control and limit the carbon emissions of mankind.

However, I have yet to see all of the above assumptions to be true, especially the first, and the last two.   The sun is too hot and too variable (e.i. solar flares, sun spots) to not affect the mean temperature of the earth in different ways, at different times, at different places.   This is why weather is so variable on earth and Mars, which has much more severe weather and is farther from the sun.

As per government, the only way that I could see global government working, not just working well, is if that government has no political motivations.   However, human ambition is too prevelant and human ingenuity is too great for any government to not be used for private gains, thus politics is inevitable.

Based on the above, I say that we should keep government down and encourage less emmisive and more efficient means of transportation and power generation.   So far only hyrdo-dams and nuclear power plants solve the latter.    

US government restricts nuclear power plant production, so I am betting that that government is acting against Americans, in this respect.   So, yes, nation states, like the US, are allowing increased carbon emissions by not allowing power companies to invest in nuclear power plants, and only for the political reason of fear about the plants exploding.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Assuming the following:<br />
-global temperature is not affected by the sun&#8217;s fluctuations;<br />
-global temperature is directly affected by human carbon emissions;<br />
-human carbon emissions are greater than such natural emmissions like volcano erruptions and ocean emmission and absortion of CO2;<br />
-such human carbon emmissions are bad;<br />
-government can control something as complicated as the weather by forcing humans to act or not act in certain ways;<br />
-the bigger the government gets, the more efficient it becomes, and the less corrupt it becomes;</p>
<p>then, yes, only global government could control and limit the carbon emissions of mankind.</p>
<p>However, I have yet to see all of the above assumptions to be true, especially the first, and the last two.   The sun is too hot and too variable (e.i. solar flares, sun spots) to not affect the mean temperature of the earth in different ways, at different times, at different places.   This is why weather is so variable on earth and Mars, which has much more severe weather and is farther from the sun.</p>
<p>As per government, the only way that I could see global government working, not just working well, is if that government has no political motivations.   However, human ambition is too prevelant and human ingenuity is too great for any government to not be used for private gains, thus politics is inevitable.</p>
<p>Based on the above, I say that we should keep government down and encourage less emmisive and more efficient means of transportation and power generation.   So far only hyrdo-dams and nuclear power plants solve the latter.    </p>
<p>US government restricts nuclear power plant production, so I am betting that that government is acting against Americans, in this respect.   So, yes, nation states, like the US, are allowing increased carbon emissions by not allowing power companies to invest in nuclear power plants, and only for the political reason of fear about the plants exploding.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Google vs. Bing &#8211; round 2 by Raymond-Maurice, Freiherr van Pottelberg</title>
		<link>http://undefined.com/ia/2010/04/20/google-vs-bing-round-2/comment-page-1/#comment-766146</link>
		<dc:creator>Raymond-Maurice, Freiherr van Pottelberg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Jun 2010 11:30:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://undefined.com/ia/?p=477#comment-766146</guid>
		<description>Even a stopped clock is right twice each day ... briefly.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Even a stopped clock is right twice each day &#8230; briefly.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on I see your meta and meta it! by jb</title>
		<link>http://undefined.com/ia/2010/04/27/i-see-your-meta-and-meta-it/comment-page-1/#comment-758438</link>
		<dc:creator>jb</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Apr 2010 11:57:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://undefined.com/ia/?p=482#comment-758438</guid>
		<description>Other way around - Apple was possessive of their hardware platform, and wouldn&#039;t let anyone build peripherals for it.    

Perhaps I should have said &#039;IBM&#039; instead of Microsoft.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Other way around &#8211; Apple was possessive of their hardware platform, and wouldn&#8217;t let anyone build peripherals for it.    </p>
<p>Perhaps I should have said &#8216;IBM&#8217; instead of Microsoft.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on I see your meta and meta it! by Walter R. Moore</title>
		<link>http://undefined.com/ia/2010/04/27/i-see-your-meta-and-meta-it/comment-page-1/#comment-758185</link>
		<dc:creator>Walter R. Moore</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Apr 2010 22:23:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://undefined.com/ia/?p=482#comment-758185</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m trying to think of an example of Microsoft being this possessive of its platform, and I can&#039;t, really.  MSFT was more likely to quietly arrange their next release to crash your app than do that. 

&quot;Java? knock yourself out! And here&#039;s some lovely windows-only extensions you might like, and a free IDE for C#.&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m trying to think of an example of Microsoft being this possessive of its platform, and I can&#8217;t, really.  MSFT was more likely to quietly arrange their next release to crash your app than do that. </p>
<p>&#8220;Java? knock yourself out! And here&#8217;s some lovely windows-only extensions you might like, and a free IDE for C#.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on I see your meta and meta it! by jb</title>
		<link>http://undefined.com/ia/2010/04/27/i-see-your-meta-and-meta-it/comment-page-1/#comment-758103</link>
		<dc:creator>jb</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Apr 2010 18:47:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://undefined.com/ia/?p=482#comment-758103</guid>
		<description>I saw what the license said, but now it would be Apple&#039;s burden to prove that the code was &quot;originally&quot; written in C/etc, which is a much, much more difficult job.  

Besides, what about the libraries you use.  What about BISON or YACC grammars?  What about Eclipse or IntelliJ generating code for you?  That&#039;s not &quot;originally&quot; written in C.  What about Makefiles that generate header files or About.. files or changelogs? What about WSDL?  

I suspect one of two results:
1) Clever developers subvert Apple&#039;s rules so effectively that Apple gives up on this stupid concept.
2) Developers switch to Android, because they can get more done with less hassle.

The second case would be a rehash, more or less, of the Apple/Microsoft confrontation of the late 80s</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I saw what the license said, but now it would be Apple&#8217;s burden to prove that the code was &#8220;originally&#8221; written in C/etc, which is a much, much more difficult job.  </p>
<p>Besides, what about the libraries you use.  What about BISON or YACC grammars?  What about Eclipse or IntelliJ generating code for you?  That&#8217;s not &#8220;originally&#8221; written in C.  What about Makefiles that generate header files or About.. files or changelogs? What about WSDL?  </p>
<p>I suspect one of two results:<br />
1) Clever developers subvert Apple&#8217;s rules so effectively that Apple gives up on this stupid concept.<br />
2) Developers switch to Android, because they can get more done with less hassle.</p>
<p>The second case would be a rehash, more or less, of the Apple/Microsoft confrontation of the late 80s</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

