June 5, 2007

RESTful but not HTTP-based?

Harry Pierson says:

Yet, I get the feeling that the REST community would consider a solution that uses the REST architectural style but not HTTP and/or URI as “not RESTful”.

In general, I suspect that the community might balk.   But I happen to believe that a resource-oriented communications protocol should be implementation independent.   One should be able to implement a RESTful protocol in just about any messaging system.

No Comments »

No comments yet.

RSS feed for comments on this post. | TrackBack URI
You can also bookmark this on del.icio.us or check the cosmos

Leave a comment

XHTML ( You can use these tags): <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong> .